Divorce & Family Law

Procedure for Filing a Criminal Revision Petition

By Vidhi Legal Services  |  June 15, 2025

Procedure for Filing a Criminal Revision Petition — detailed guide by Vidhi Legal Services. Learn about the legal process, procedures, and your rights under Indian law. Expert legal insights.

Introduction

At Vidhi Legal Services, we understand that navigating the Indian legal system can be overwhelming. This comprehensive guide explains procedure for filing a criminal revision petition in simple terms, covering the legal framework, procedures, and practical steps involved. Whether you are a litigant, a student, or a legal professional, this article provides valuable insights into one of the most important aspects of Indian law.

The Indian legal system is built on a rich foundation of statutes, precedents, and procedural codes that govern every aspect of civil and criminal justice. Understanding these principles is essential for protecting your rights and fulfilling your legal obligations. Our team of experienced advocates at Vidhi Legal Services has decades of combined experience handling cases across all courts in India.

In this article, we delve deep into the subject matter, addressing common questions, outlining step-by-step procedures, and highlighting key legal provisions. We also discuss recent judicial interpretations and amendments that affect how the law is applied today. By the end of this guide, you will have a thorough understanding of the topic and the confidence to take the next steps in your legal journey.

What is a Criminal Revision Petition?

A criminal revision petition is a legal remedy available to a person who is aggrieved by an order passed by a subordinate criminal court. Unlike an appeal, which is a continuation of the original proceedings, a revision is a supervisory power exercised by a superior court to examine the legality, correctness, or propriety of any order passed by a lower court. The power of revision is governed by Sections 397 to 405 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The purpose of revision is to prevent a miscarriage of justice and to correct any patent error or irregularity in the proceedings of lower courts. The revisional jurisdiction is discretionary, and the court may refuse to exercise it if there is no substantial question of law or if the petitioner has an alternative remedy available. The High Court and the Sessions Court have concurrent revisional jurisdiction, though the High Court's powers are wider.

Grounds for Filing a Revision Petition

A revision petition can be filed on various grounds, including errors of law, errors of fact, irregularity in procedure, lack of jurisdiction, and miscarriage of justice. The petitioner must show that the order passed by the lower court is illegal, improper, or incorrect. The revisional court can examine the records of the lower court and can call for the record of any proceeding to satisfy itself about the correctness, legality, or propriety of the order.

Under Section 397(2) CrPC, no revision petition lies against an interlocutory order. An interlocutory order is an order that does not finally determine the rights of the parties and is passed during the pendency of the proceedings. Only final orders or orders that affect the rights of the parties can be challenged in revision. The Supreme Court in Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra laid down guidelines for determining what constitutes an interlocutory order.

Procedure for Filing a Revision Petition

A revision petition under Section 397 CrPC can be filed before either the Sessions Court or the High Court. The petition must be filed within 90 days from the date of the order, though the court may condone the delay in certain circumstances. The petition should contain the grounds for revision, supported by an affidavit. Copies of the impugned order and relevant documents must be annexed.

The procedure begins with filing the petition in the registry of the court. The petitioner must pay the prescribed court fee and serve notice on the opposite party. The court may admit the petition for hearing, issue notice to the respondent, and call for the records of the lower court. After hearing both parties, the court may confirm, reverse, or modify the order, or make any other order as it thinks fit. The court can also exercise its power suo motu (on its own) under Section 397(1).

Powers of the Revisional Court

Under Section 401 of the CrPC, the revisional court has extensive powers. It can exercise all the powers conferred on an appellate court, except that it cannot convert a finding of acquittal into a finding of conviction. The court can set aside the order, reduce the sentence, stay the proceedings, or pass any other appropriate order. The court can also order further inquiry or trial by a court of competent jurisdiction.

However, the revisional court cannot convert a finding of acquittal into conviction. If the court finds that the accused has been wrongly acquitted, it can order a retrial or further inquiry. The revisional jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly and only to prevent a grave miscarriage of justice. The Supreme Court in K.K. Verma v. Union of India held that the revisional court should not interfere with an order merely because a different view is possible.

Frequently Asked Questions

An appeal is a statutory right that allows a party to challenge the merits of a decision, while a revision is a discretionary supervisory power. Appeal involves rehearing of the case on facts and law, while revision is limited to examining the legality and propriety of the order.
No, Section 397(2) CrPC expressly bars revision petitions against interlocutory orders. Only final orders or orders that terminate the proceedings can be challenged through revision. Interlocutory orders can be challenged through a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.
The limitation period for filing a criminal revision petition is 90 days from the date of the impugned order. However, the court has the discretion to condone the delay if sufficient cause is shown for the delay in filing.
No, the revisional court cannot increase the sentence of the accused without giving them an opportunity of being heard. The court can only affirm, reduce, or modify the sentence. If the court feels that the sentence is inadequate, it may pass appropriate orders to remedy the situation.

About the Author

Vidhi Legal Services

Divorce & Family Law Experts

Vidhi Legal Services is a trusted law firm based in Kolkata, India, specializing in divorce and family law matters. With years of experience in handling complex litigation, alternative dispute resolution, and legal documentation, our team is committed to providing compassionate and effective legal representation to every client.

Need Legal Assistance?

Get expert legal guidance from Vidhi Legal Services. Our experienced advocates are here to help you with your legal matters.

Book Your Free Consultation

Fill the form below and our legal team will contact you within 2 hours